It is a cliché to speak of the complicated situation that is lived today, and if it is observed closely, it will also have to do with a powerful hand that has moved the media to persuade the people about that, the idea is not to fall in a Conspiratorial fear of the state or “lodges” against society, but rather question how well is designed, and up to what point the contents exposed on mass information platforms are being reflected; Is it enough to retrieve useful information for the rating that involves suicide ideas, do harm, or mark certain political positions in the name of freedom of expression? So far, have been the children victims of the vexations that in so much detail mentions the media? By holding certain people accountable for the harm inflicted to our infancy, is the state “washing its hands” of its responsibility as the primary guarantor of its fundamental rights?.
Beyond the discourse in which just this epoch is itself a leviathan, the worrying questions arise around the premises in which the values of the people are being constructed anesthetized by the yellow MASS MEDIA and the nefarious homilia of the “could be worst”. One of them is the fact of accepting the painful circumstances in which many children survive in homes and public institutions, formed with no more pedagogical model than a traditional teaching cradled in the memory of tired teachers (and quite rightly by attending 30 Or more students in a single classroom without auxiliary support), supported by the food provided to them outside because there is no bread at home (learning on an empty stomach is unfeasible) with a life project that addresses a technician education in the SENA (the largest public educational institute in Colombia) who Free them from the minimum salary (without saying that it is wrong, only that the ideal would be a country with the majority its inhabitants being professional) and called for an absurd bombardment of obscene content even in the promotion of kitchen disinfectant, to a rampant reproduction of children which will probably follow the cycle.
Meanwhile, the other premise is to accept being governed by the “counterpart” those children and girls attending schools and gardens by graduates, therapists, speech therapists, psychologists and all the structure that supports “correcting” any inconsistency in their growth . They know that they come to the world to work for goals in most cases very clear, they understand the schemes of the boss and stewardship (they will never accept to be part of the second group) and when they raise to the high spheres of the government of our weak minds, will take care of trengthening the inequality by guaranteeing the shortage of opportunities, carving with the chisel of ignorance the certainty of his permanence in the power.
Finally, I consider it vitally important that this moment in what we now call early childhood and in which boys and girls are immersed, requires to be an issue that moves from the hands of media and political manipulation to the active participation of all members of the state as guarantors of the fundamental rights of our children.